I scoffed when some friends and colleagues speculated after Sarah Palin's well-received convention speech could have a major effect on the campaign in her running mate's favor. I also scoffed when some people I talked to claimed that Palin's much less well-received television interviews would be devastating to her ticket. The reason was simple. To oversimplify only slightly, political science research suggests that vice presidential choices have little effect on election outcomes. Indeed, despite what the priorities of media coverage might imply, campaigns as a whole have only a marginal effect on election outcomes (which can be explained with considerable accuracy by a few external factors, most notably whether the candidate in an incumbent and the condition of the economy.) History suggests the vice presidential choices might increase the chances that a candidate will win a running mate's home state, and otherwise matter very little. And since Palin came from 1)a small state that 2)was already solidly Republican, McCain's choice figured to have a negligible effect.
John Sides at the Monkey Cage, however, points us to a fascinating analysis of the 2008 campaign suggesting that I may have been wrong to dismiss the potential impact of a Palin pick so quickly. Political scientist Richard Johnston (author of the seminal study in voting behavior Letting the People Decide) and Emily Thorson (blogger as well as political scientist), have found data suggesting that the Palin choose may well have had a substantial impact on the 2008 election. Tracing McCain's approval ratings, the argue that it was Palin, not the economy, that explain's McCain's losing margin:
The failure of the economy to move the campaign is a puzzle in its own right. Election after election shows that perceptions of the economy are a crucial force shaping vote preference. Why then did events as terrifying as the meltdown not translate into electoral decisions? And if the meltdown did not drive the dynamics of the campaign, what did?
We think the answer to this question starts with Sarah Palin, and we base this judgment on the level of detail made possible by the NAES. John McCain’s August 29 announcement of Palin as his running mate surprised the Republican establishment, the media, and especially voters. She made a strong first impression: she enjoyed high approval ratings after her acceptance speech, and the percentage of voters saying that they intended to vote Republican skyrocketed. But within days of the speech, her ratings began a precipitous slide from which she—and the McCain campaign—never recovered. Throughout the rest of the campaign, vote intentions were closely tied to Palin’s approval ratings: each major Palin approval drop was followed, within a day or two, by a drop in McCain vote intention. No other factor moved McCain support with such precision. Comparison of the correlation between running mate approval ratings and vote intentions from 2000 and 2004 confirms Palin’s peculiar importance in 2008.
Of course, as Johnston and Thorson acknowledge, the data is merely suggestive; it cannot prove that Palin had an unprecedented effect on the 2008 elections. But, at the very least, it means that we cannot easily dismiss claims that vice presidential selections may be more consequential than past elections have suggested. What this also means is that political scientists, when studying elections, always have to be modest in their conclusions, for an obvious reason: the relative rarity of presidential elections means that we have to draw conclusions based on relatively small samples, often encompassing very different historical eras. Particularly given that there are many ambiguities in analyzing individual elections as well, it's important not to be too confident that past historical patterns will recur. After all, even if the previous consensus of the research was correct, history can change. Even if vice presidential choices had little impact in most past elections, they may matter more in the future for reasons we can't fully identify yet.
Reformulate the usual consensus thus:
"a vice presidential choice has little effect on election outcome *unless* it casts serious doubt on the judgment of the presidential candidate"
and you will find it is consistent with 2008 as well as past experience.
Posted by: brosna | May 02, 2010 at 12:32 PM
Are you sure that the other guy's complextion didn't have something to do with it? Well add that to the "I'm ahead on points so I'm gonna play real conservative" approach of Obama.
Posted by: lawguy | May 02, 2010 at 12:58 PM
Brosna nailed it. Perhaps "a vice presidential choice has little effect on election outcome *unless* it casts serious doubt on the judgment of the presidential candidate [whom many voters can easily visualize dying in office and leaving the country in the hands of a blithering idiot.]"
Posted by: Axelrod Shindig | May 02, 2010 at 09:45 PM
Thank you for sharing life experience. We are in the same place where we can share your happiness. Thank you very much!
Posted by: cheap air yeezy | November 01, 2010 at 12:01 AM
I shall remember that happiness day forever.
Posted by: Discount Ugg Boots | November 05, 2010 at 05:04 AM
*To trust myself, and believe everything nice!
Posted by: christian louboutin | November 05, 2010 at 09:58 PM
You have to do so, can remain calm, respect and love another man!
Posted by: cheap air yeezy | November 12, 2010 at 03:21 AM
We would find much happiness in reviewing the past.
Posted by: chanel replica watches | November 12, 2010 at 08:12 PM
oh that's nice!
Posted by: buy taobao | November 12, 2010 at 09:50 PM
I can imagine TONS of uses for this
Posted by: taobao in english | November 12, 2010 at 10:35 PM
i love this post
Posted by: moncler jackets | November 13, 2010 at 01:54 AM
To be or not to be, it is a question.
Posted by: taobao in english | November 13, 2010 at 02:03 AM
Good suggestions as usual!
Posted by: nike air max | November 13, 2010 at 03:47 AM
*You live on in each new day.
Posted by: Cheap Air Jordan | December 09, 2010 at 07:59 PM
Some of my favorites are Metric, mum, THE MELVINS, The Locust, Thee More Shallows, Grandaddy, Mahogany, Abstrackt Keal Agram, Junior Boys, TRS80 and ISO50! You are in my top five since 2006!
Posted by: Heated Floor Mats | January 14, 2011 at 10:37 AM
I opine that to get the loan from creditors you ought to present a firm motivation. Nevertheless, once I've got a term loan, just because I wanted to buy a house.
Posted by: SolomonPriscilla24 | February 15, 2011 at 11:03 PM
nevertheless very interest to this vacation. holidays have gifts, gifts must talk about wine, saying "no wine not a seat them!"
Posted by: Discount Ed Hardy Christian | May 10, 2011 at 11:31 PM
Are you sure that the other guy's complextion didn't have something to do with it? Well add that to the "I'm ahead on points so I'm gonna play real conservative" approach of Obama...
Posted by: authentic air jordan shoes | June 19, 2011 at 09:46 PM
Good advise!
Posted by: Car electronics | July 04, 2011 at 09:55 PM
You have to do so, can remain calm, respect and love another man!
Posted by: Beats by dre | September 13, 2011 at 10:14 PM
Having read this post, I have learned for myself a lot of the new.
Posted by: Coach Outlet Online | September 14, 2011 at 01:55 AM
I loved the kettle caramel flavor, so did my boyfriend. The popcorn is crunchy since it is covered with caramel. It sounds wierd but it is worth the try!Check these guys out for really good, and unique, flavors. The cheese course duo is one of my favorites, but I've liked everything I've tried. Too bad they're in Scottsdale. Time for a trip back.
Posted by: coach handbags | September 14, 2011 at 05:15 AM
Super cute! My little man would look so stylin' in those!
Posted by: retro air jordan | September 26, 2011 at 08:06 PM
so pretty.You are a good teacher. Lucky student!
Posted by: suprayouth | September 28, 2011 at 04:46 PM
Venice resident Rhonda DeVictor said she noticed the empty lot when she first moved into the neighborhood 12 years ago
Posted by: manolo blahnik shoes | October 08, 2011 at 01:11 PM