By Scott Lemieux
In his classic book The Politics Presidents Make, the Yale political scientist Stephen Skowronek argues that the basic structure of American politics can be broken down into a remarkably small number of eras: The Jeffersonian (1800-1828), the Jacksonian (1828-1860), the Republican (1860-1932), the New Deal (1932-1980), and the Reagan Revolution (1980-?). Once we understand the basic politics of a period, we can see presidents facing recurring political challenges that are comparable to a number of past presidents. Skowronek uses four categories, based on 1)the health of the dominant regime and 2)the president's relationship to that regime:
For the most recent political era, Reagan was the reconstructive president, challenging existing political and constitutional understandings with substantial success. Both Presidents Bush were "affiliated" presidents, articulating and extending the politics initiated by Reagan. (Except for the fact that he won re-election, George W. Bush is comparable to Lyndon Johnson, in that the regime reached its apotheosis under his administration, but in many respects the dominant regime's underlying political coalition collapsed.) Clinton -- who Skowronek, remarkably, predicted could face a serious impeachment treat just after his re-election -- was a "pre-emptive" president, attempting to keep a minority political coalition together while collaborating in important respects with the dominant regime.)
Which brings us to an interesting question -- does the Obama administration represent a new political era? In a sense, the success (or lack thereof) of his proposed health care reform represents the first major test. If major legislation reflecting a different understanding of the role of government passes, combined with such factors as some clashes with federal courts still largely under the control of the Reagan regime and electoral validation in 2012, we may in retrospect see the 2008 election as pivotal. Conversely, if Obama cannot secure re-election and his legislative accomplishments are more limited or less durable than might be expected, the Obama administration could be seen as a failed pre-emptive president in an overwhelmingly Republican era. Which do you see as more likely?
I was Skowronek's TA back in 1998-9. He is touchingly modest about the book and acknowledges that his scheme is very broad and general (though, obviously, he still thinks it's useful).
One thing to remember is that Reconstructive presidents (he had another name for them, which I misremember) are often /less/ effective than their successors. That's because they're busy changing the paradigm, shifting the Overton Window, and dealing with the damaged but still potent remnants of the ancien regime. It's often their successors -- the articulators -- who actually get more stuff done. So, Truman and Johnson arguably did more, or at least more per year of office, than FDR. Remember, most of the New Deal reforms were bitterly opposed, and much of the First New Deal got rolled back or repealed. Similarly, Reagan had a much more hawkish foreign policy than the couple of presidents preceding him, but it took the Bushes to actually get us into large foreign wars.
Skowronek takes a long view, and I don't think he'd see health care as definitive. (Though it might be very suggestive, sure.)
Note that pre-emptive presidents tend to win re-election (Wilson, Ike, Nixon, Clinton), but they also tend to have godawful second terms.
Doug M.
Posted by: Doug M. | December 12, 2009 at 04:16 PM
Thank you for this good article! I can recommend you a good search engine on rapidshare files( http://www.rapidsharemix.com )
Posted by: Christine | April 06, 2010 at 04:18 AM
nothing in the world is impossible if you set your mind to do it.
Posted by: lacoste shirts | July 05, 2010 at 11:00 PM
When an end is lawful and obligatory, the indispensable means to is are also lawful and obligatory .Do you understand?
Posted by: lacoste shoes | July 22, 2010 at 02:31 AM
these are times with more liberty,but less joy; we have much more food,but less nutrition;who could told me why?
Posted by: discount coach | July 27, 2010 at 08:52 PM
Live told us don’t struggle so much,best things happen when not expected. Did you agree with me?
Posted by: coach handbags | July 29, 2010 at 10:40 PM
most of the New Deal reforms were bitterly opposed, and much of the First New Deal got rolled back or repealed.
Posted by: guildwars2 gold | September 20, 2010 at 04:48 AM
Just got introduced to your site, and I'm finding it inspirational. I have a long way to go to clean up my act, but your example and information are truly helpful.
thanks!! i love all american...
Posted by: Impotence causes | October 04, 2010 at 01:30 PM
Jimmy Choo's beginnings can be traced back to his workshop in London Borough of Hackney, North London, which he opened in 1986 by renting an old hospital building.
Posted by: jimmy choo | October 14, 2010 at 11:43 PM
Looking forward to reading more about this theory. My model is a little different (seeing Obama in the same position relative to the Conservative Era as Nixon was to the Liberal Era). But this sounds very much worth learning more about. Thanks.
Posted by: David | October 15, 2010 at 09:58 AM
I just walk around, suprised by your blog,please give more information.
Posted by: sale ugg boots | November 02, 2010 at 08:39 PM
This moment will nap, you will have a dream; But this moment study,you will interpret a dream.
Posted by: air jordans | November 02, 2010 at 09:15 PM
I wish you great blessings and love.*
Posted by: coach outlet stores | November 04, 2010 at 10:13 PM
I wish you great blessings and love.*
Posted by: coach outlet stores | November 04, 2010 at 10:15 PM
Write very well, there are some others that resonate.
Posted by: air jordans | November 07, 2010 at 08:19 PM
You are mighty.Nobody loves like you, Lord. You are a mighty God. You are mighty.
Posted by: Supra Shoes | November 08, 2010 at 01:51 AM
is necessary to hope. . . for hope itself is happiness.
Posted by: Supra Footwear | November 09, 2010 at 03:42 AM
Faith is the starting point of all accumulation of riches!Faith is the basis of all "miracles",And all mysteries which cannot be analyzed by the rules of science!
Posted by: cheap chanel handbags | November 10, 2010 at 01:01 AM
Genius only means hard-working all one's life.
Posted by: supra skytop | November 10, 2010 at 01:34 AM
I was Skowronek's TA back in 1998-9. He is touchingly modest about the book and acknowledges that his scheme is very broad and general (though, obviously, he still thinks it's useful).
Posted by: Shox R4 Shoes | November 10, 2010 at 01:46 AM
My perfect theories.
Posted by: nike air max | November 10, 2010 at 10:00 PM
Wow! Great info. I wish, I could have such a writing skills.*
Posted by: coach bags | November 11, 2010 at 02:07 AM
i love you post
Posted by: UGG Shoes | November 11, 2010 at 04:46 AM
Pitching cake with each other at birthday party is the most common scene sweet, frolic hurt, happiness or endurance?
Posted by: Coach Outlet | November 12, 2010 at 02:56 AM
oh that's nice!
Posted by: buy taobao | November 12, 2010 at 09:04 PM