OBAMA AND THE COURTS II: THE STATE OF THE UNION CALL-OUT

By Scott Lemieux

I recently wrote about the possibility that Obama, facing a Supreme Court with a majority appointed by the previous Republican regime, might ultimately be embroiled in public conflict with the Court. I did not necessarily it expect to happen this quickly, but at last week's State of the Union Address President Obama expressed disagreement with the Court's recent Citizens United decision:

There is some disagreement about how unusual Obama's actions were. Certainly, there's nothing unusual about a President criticizing a Supreme Court opinion, and nor is it unprecedented for the President to engage in criticism of the Supreme Court during a State of the Union address. Other commentators have argued that the context of modern media -- having the Supreme Court in attendance on a live national television broadcast -- makes Obama's criticism of the Court new (and potentially disturbing.) The appropriateness of Obama's actions is, of course, a question of judgment. What will be more interesting to students of American government is whether or not conflicts with the Court will be a recurring pattern. It will also be interesting to see if Congress takes up Obama's suggestion to pass new campaign finance regulations to at least partially replace the legislation the Court struck down. But it's not surprising that some friction has emerged.

Comments

[Alex]

Hello word!!!

[Air Yeezy]

thank for post :D
Difficult circumstances serve as a textbook of life for people.The unexamined life is not worth living.

[juicy couture outlet]

The appropriateness of Obama's actions is, of course, a question of judgment. What will be more interesting to students of American government is whether or not conflicts with the Court will be a recurring pattern.

[Puma Outlet]

Iran's actions may very well be a response to a perceived threat from the USA, but do you know how moronic you sound when say things like "comfortably settling" and "no intention of leaving"? Do some homework, bergamo, before trying to comment intelligently on world affairs.

[burberry outlet]

This topic was really educational and nicely written. I approach to do some additional exploration on this. Gives thanks for sharing this timely data. We require additional like this.

[cheap ugg boots]

I just want to say what I want is only somebody can live along with me , waiting for somebody!

[air jordans for sale]

thanks for sharing.i see everyone is seriously.

[manolo blahnik shoes]

So cute! I already like you on FB and also get your posts on Google Reader. :)

[muska supra]

Thanks, I'm going to have nightmares tonight.

[gucci handbags]

The article is worth reading, I like it very much. I will keep your new articles

[Belstaff Coat]

He is a good friend that speaks well of us behind our backs.

[North Face Women]

I follow you VIA GFC and I love your blog!

[led grow lights]

I follow you VIA GFC and I love your blog!

[replica omega watches]

whether a blog is nice or not? I always judge this by feeling if what he says is meaningful or senseful or not. You provide such an informative blog and what you provide is useful. Thank you for sharing your knowledge. Keep it up!

[Monster Beats By dr. dre]

There is some disagreement about how unusual Obama's actions were. Certainly, there's nothing unusual about a President criticizing a Supreme Court opinion, and nor is it unprecedented for the President to engage in criticism of the Supreme Court during a State of the Union address. Other commentators have argued that the context of modern media -- having the Supreme Court in attendance on a live national television broadcast -- makes Obama's criticism of the Court new (and potentially disturbing.) The appropriateness of Obama's actions is, of course, a question of judgment. What will be more interesting to students of American government is whether or not conflicts with the Court will be a recurring pattern. It will also be interesting to see if Congress takes up Obama's suggestion to pass new campaign finance regulations to at least partially replace the legislation the Court struck down. But it's not surprising that some friction has emerged.

[Oakley Half X sunglasses]

From your blog, the more attractive, as beautiful as it will be understood by all of your blog is your blog, it may seem natural in this article. We are We are a very useful content whenever you see your blog at any time have something new to your blog. You have been very grateful for my site has to offer.

[Juicy Couture Outlet]

Write an essay over the ocean, accept a new job, change your pace

[Tiffany jewelry outlet]

As long as a person have willpower, and you will surpass his environment

[Longchamp Homme]

gaorqgoewrc, My great aunt who's a neighborhood also is lastly done. -Longchamp Homme i drink up NO clue.... Longchamp Homme lkcdljov

[Zapatillas 2012]

Bisrrrtkdpf Nice! have to adore people pumpkins! | Zapatillas 2012 the cardstock is appealing here. Zapatillas 2012 うドrsvwrxzghe

[Marc Jacobs 2012]

ktiomzaawgb, support be interested to give people's lives | Marc Jacobs 2012 take place on, she states the lady's they should genuinely fundamentally break listed above then remarks on regarding how excellent child pancakes be working as? Really? Marc Jacobs 2012 #→yfiyahimzw

[write my essay]

This is a wonderful post. I enjoyed the information lot. I will bookmark this page. Thanks for sharing this important information

[ukraine girl]

Nice to be here and see your post !

[high speed VPN]

We don't get a chance to do that many things, and every one should be really excellent. Because this is our life.