By Scott Lemieux
Some court observers who might generally be considered allies of President Obama have expressed concerns about the solicitude for executive power shown by Obama's second Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan. There is at least some evidence for claims that, while Kagan is unlikely to support the strongest claims of executive power advanced by the Bush administration, she is likely to give a much wider berth to the executive branch than many liberals and libertarians would prefer.
Beyond Kagan's (very thin) record of views on the subject, there is a more general reason for suspecting that Kagan might disappoint some supporters of the President on executive power. The punchline to the article I discussed in my last post is that the intersection of law and politics can be expected to lead to judges who are deferential to claims of executive power, especially during wartime. According to Graber, from a standpoint of judicial behavior, the process might be expected to look like this:
- "Judge Strategy," whose overriding concern is insulating the Supreme Court from political pressures than might undermine judicial power in the long run, can be expected to favor executive power in most circumstances. There are some exceptions -- as two landmark Supreme Court opinions have demonstrated, when the president and/or the war the president supports are relatively unpopular, the Supreme Court has shown some willingness to constrain the power of the executive branch. Still, there is generally a "rally effect" on public opinion during times of war, and as result strategically-minded judges are likely to tread with extreme caution in evaluating claims of executive power during wartime.
- "Judge Attitude," who decides cases based on her policy preferences. In theory, this judge would favor controversial claims of executive power half the time, but as Graber notes in practice "attitudinal" judges are likely to favor executive assertions of power much more frequently. The president, after all, does the nominating, and is likely to "screen" for justices who will be sympathetic to future assertions of executive power. The effect is likely to be heightened during wartime, or during "reconstructive" administrations in which the president is trying to expand his political authority.
- As a result, as precedents build, "Judge Legal" -- who prefers not to innovate and is likely to follow precedents unless they clash with very strongly held preferences -- is also likely to support assertions executive power. A majority of relevant precedents will compel deference to judicial power, and even cases in which the Supreme Court rejects particular claims of executive power generally leave significant leeway for future courts to approve different assertions.
You might have it if it belongs to you,whereas you don't kvetch for it if it doesn't look within your life.
Posted by: Nike Shox Clearance | October 15, 2010 at 09:57 PM
I just walk around, suprised by your blog,please give more information.
Posted by: sale ugg boots | November 02, 2010 at 08:38 PM
Now all became clear, I thank for the help and I hope to see more such articles. ...
Posted by: Ben10 Games | May 28, 2011 at 02:05 PM
So fun article is! I agree the idea!
Posted by: birkenstock online shop | June 25, 2011 at 03:19 AM
The president, after all, does the nominating, and is likely to "screen" for justices who will be sympathetic to future assertions of executive power.
Posted by: ClubPenguinCheats | June 30, 2011 at 04:58 AM
You might have it if it belongs to you,whereas you don't kvetch for it if it doesn't look within your life.Now all became clear, I thank for the help and I hope to see more such articles. ...
Posted by: ugg boots clearance | September 14, 2011 at 01:57 AM
It's great to hear from you and see what you've been up to. In your blog I feel your enthusiasm for life. thank you.
Posted by: supra kids shoes | October 07, 2011 at 09:53 PM
let's join our hands together to stop this kind of wrong doings. It may risk lives in the future if we just let them continue.
Posted by: moncler jackets store | October 19, 2011 at 04:51 PM
I like you on facebook and follow through google reader!
Posted by: louboutin schaussures | October 22, 2011 at 12:09 PM
yes. think this is a great post because it is also very realistic and it perfectly describes the reporter's or at least the media's current tendency to do whatever it takes to obtain the best content to base their news on.
Posted by: Justin Bieber Shoes | October 25, 2011 at 03:09 AM
I absoulely agree with everything you commented
Posted by: Black Mold Removal | November 05, 2011 at 03:42 PM
I like you on facebook and follow through google reader!
Posted by: moncler doudoune uk | November 14, 2011 at 06:57 AM
We cannot always build the future for our youth , but we can build our youth for the future
Posted by: moncler outlet | December 17, 2011 at 07:43 PM
Impressive blog! -Arron
Posted by: mattress reviews | December 22, 2011 at 12:28 AM
I opine that to receive the mortgage loans from creditors you should present a firm reason. However, one time I've received a credit loan, just because I was willing to buy a car.
Posted by: Helga28PITTS | January 02, 2012 at 06:09 PM
So cute! I already like you on FB and also get your posts on Google Reader. :)
Posted by: Belstaff On Sale | January 04, 2012 at 01:31 PM
I went for business, and then give me the opportunity to learn, also let I good effort.
Posted by: peuterey jacken | February 24, 2012 at 08:44 PM