By Scott Lemieux
It has become common for pundits to bemoan the lack of substantive content in the answers given by nominees to the Supreme Court at their confirmation hearings. Indeed, the extent to which nominees have perfected the art of making sure the hearings yield little useful information about their judicial philosophies once provoked the current nominee to criticize the process (criticisms she has revoked now that she is a nominee herself.)
Why have the hearings become so bland? Although the broadly worded clauses of the Constitution that generate the most controversy permit multiple reasonable interpretations, and hence allow a lot of judicial discretion, the central theme of contemporary hearings is that Supreme Court justices simply apply the law (or, in current Chief Justice John Roberts's words, act as a "neutral umpire.") The assumption of nominees must be that -- whatever the truth -- the public will not accept the idea that a judge's values may affect their decisionmaking, even if most legal observers are well aware that "the law" in itself cannot determine how judges will choose among multiple interpretations.
According to John Sides, however, the extent to which the public is unwilling to accept a more complex view of judicial decision-making is actually highly questionable. Whatever assumptions are made by pundits, the public largely accepts the idea that empathy might inform judicial decision-making:
The Washington Post tells me that in today’s hearing, Elana Kagan “sidesteps empathy question, says ‘it’s law all the way down,’” which leads the reporter, Paul Kane, to say “So much for the empathy standard.”
I know some people who will be disappointed. The American people. About 68% of them, to be precise. That is the percentage who said in a 2009 survey that it was “very important” for Supreme Court justices to “be able to empathize with ordinary people – that is, to be able understand how the law hurts or helps the people.” Only one other quality out of a list of 12 — “Uphold the values of those who wrote the U.S. constitution long ago” — was judged very important by more respondents (74%). Only 8% of the sample said that empathy was not important at all. Empathy also attracted the support of both parties: 77% of Democrats and 61% of Republicans said that it was very important.
It is understandable, following the defeat of Robert Bork, that nominees have become risk-averse when it comes to making controversial statements. But this data suggests that they may have more leeway than current practice suggests.
after read your post,i can not wait for writing somethin on your blog,i like your pose,and will share it with my friends.i think they will also love it.
Posted by: sto credits | July 01, 2010 at 05:13 AM
Different opinions, everyone has his opinion, a decision will not satisfy everyone.
Posted by: tera gold | July 22, 2010 at 01:51 AM
Different opinions, everyone has his opinion, a decision will not satisfy everyone.
Posted by: tera gold | July 22, 2010 at 01:51 AM
Yeah,everyone has different opinion,and there are different opinion,there should be necessary to angry.
Posted by: ffxiv gil | August 25, 2010 at 05:06 AM
I just walk around, suprised by your blog,please give more information.
Posted by: ugg shoes | November 02, 2010 at 08:38 PM
I agree with you . Now all became clear, I thank for the help and I hope to see more such articles. ...
Posted by: Giochi Gratis | May 28, 2011 at 02:02 PM
So fun article is! I agree the idea!
Posted by: birkenstock online shop | June 25, 2011 at 03:20 AM
People in every country get the mortgage loans from various creditors, just because that is simple and comfortable.
Posted by: HAMMOND18Brigitte | September 06, 2011 at 04:18 AM
after read your post,i can not wait for writing somethin on your blog,i like your pose,and will share it with my friends.i think they will also love it.
Posted by: uggs outlet | September 14, 2011 at 01:57 AM
let's join our hands together to stop this kind of wrong doings. It may risk lives in the future if we just let them continue.
Posted by: supra vaider | September 27, 2011 at 03:24 PM
It's great to hear from you and see what you've been up to. In your blog I feel your enthusiasm for life. thank you.
Posted by: justin supra shoes | October 12, 2011 at 06:45 AM
Cars and houses are expensive and not everybody is able to buy it. However, mortgage loans was created to help people in such situations.
Posted by: mortgage loans | November 04, 2011 at 01:01 AM
So cute! I already like you on FB and also get your posts on Google Reader. :)
Posted by: supra shoes | November 06, 2011 at 02:26 PM
It's so nice to have you do all of the research for us. It makes our decision making so much easier!! Thanks.
Posted by: Moncler Jackets Kids | November 12, 2011 at 05:20 PM
I like your article and I got more from it.Thanks ^^.I'll share it with my friends.
And I also want to share something good with you.
californication season 4 dvd:
http://www.dvdboxroom.com/products/1239-Californication-Season-4-DVD-Boxset.html
Those DVDs are really good and cheap with high quality.
Posted by: californication season 4 dvd | January 20, 2012 at 12:16 AM